On October 11, UCSB Professor Chris Newfield added a new post on UC pension reform to his blog, Remaking the University. The post includes the following compilation of recent pension analyses by unions and faculty groups from across the UC system.
Senate Faculty Welfare past chairs Jim Chalfant and Helen Hunt's overview of the PEB recommendations. (Transcript).
Senate Vice Chair Robert A. Anderson's "Misleading Statements in “Response to ‘A Dissenting Statement by Staff and Academic Senate Members of the Work Groups of The President’s Task Force on Post-Employment Benefits’ (9-25-10)”
Bob Samuels' "Union Response to Pension Changes"(October 11)
Prof. Onuttom Narayan's analysis of the PEB Report's flaws (September).
A new quantitative analysis (Sept 20th) of the Santa Cruz campus's Committee on Faculty Welfare suggesting that both sets of post-employment benefit changes recommended by the Task Force Steering Committee will hit middle- and low-income UC employees proportionally more than those in higher brackets.
The California Professor's analysis of the PEB report. (August)
The UCLA Faculty Association's comparison of the PEB plan to the CalPERS haircut.
UC-AFT President Bob Samuels remarkable post of the overall pension issue (September).
San Francisco Chronicle coverage
Our August review of the PEB report
Read the full post here.
